I’m very excited to welcome Joey Mornin, our new Online Director. In the coming weeks and months, he’ll be working with the Fix Congress First community to coordinate our online organizing efforts.

He comes to us from Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Joey brings extensive experience from a range of online activist efforts, including the T. Boone Pickens alternative energy campaign, and an in-depth knowledge and understanding of how to use technology to galvanize and engage a community. He will lead our digital grassroots efforts towards change in Washington.

The full announcement is here.

The point of the new reading technologies, it often seems, is to avoid deep immersion, precisely because it’s an activity the crowd can’t influence or control and thus a violation of the iron rule of digital existence: Never be alone. Deep, private reading and thought have begun to feel subversive. A decade ago, the digital space was heralded for the endless opportunities it offered for individual expression. The question now is how truly individual–as in bold, original, unique–you can be if you never step back from the crowd.

Hear, hear!

1. And the stellas were shinings. And the earthnight strewed aromatose. His pibrook creppt mong the donkness. A reek was waft on the luftstream. He was ours, all fragrance. And we were his for a lifetime. O dulcid dreamings languidous! Taboccoo!
2. Decidedly entering the phone increase, your make pool, or dentist dwelling-place, discernment how much you would raise into the mankind to compensate for away delight resign you the adeptness you sine qua non to implore circumambient an eye.
3. Anyone heart the hypothesis to terminate the bounty of something is an eye to the most part reactive to the aureate motion things are by when dealing with every tom – What is designed representing in unison is designed as a service to all.
4. While elvery stream winds seling on for to keep this barrel of bounty rolling and the nightmail afarfrom morning nears.
5. There are soupçon things discomfiting less haggling greater than the sacrifice of anything. Profit Christian Louboutin shoes purchaser understand scarcely any boundaries with regards to asking in give back a much improve deal.

Here’s hoping that the magical and revolutionary e-book publishers keep the adjectival tradition alive.

(For the answers, see the comments section below.)

Hardcover should come w/digi version, like vinyl!—@sara_mc

I can’t comment on the legality, but I sure think it’s ethically acceptable.—@anasqtiesh

I agree—as long as I don’t distribute it, I don’t see any ethical problem with downloading a digital copy. Is it any different than manually typing it into my computer, letter for letter, or building a book scanner and using OCR software to convert it to plain text?

I don’t know about the legal status, though. Can any lawyers shed some light? And for extra credit: does it make any difference whether I buy the book new or used? If I digitize it, am I allowed to load it onto my Kindle?

Update: Legal eagle Andy Sellars says, “fair use would be your shield, if anything. Some countries expressly allow for reproductions like this, but US is not one.”

Update #2: The Ethicist at the New York Times looked at the same question and reached a similar conclusion.

Nicholas Carr gave a reading at the Harvard Book Store last week from his new book, “The Shallows“—a well-informed but frustrating sequel to his argument that Google might be making us stupid.

I agree with Carr that webby habits can make us “stupid,” and thankfully he’s far more thoughtful than that in the book. He lays out recent research showing that neuroplasticity doesn’t end when you reach adulthood—which is good news, except, according to Carr, the way we use the Internet (or the way Internet uses us, as Carr so cleverly flips it) might be reshaping our brains in a harmful way. Since digital media are constantly distracting us and forcing us to multitask, the argument goes, we spend ever less time “thinking deeply” and ever more time skipping from link to link and tab to tab. “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words,” Carr waxes. “Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.”

I think this is true. If I spend a day hopping from emails to IMs to texts, etc., I feel more distracted, and it’s harder to curl up with a book for hours on end. There are plenty of studies showing that this type of omnivorism has cognitive benefits, too, but it’s definitely the case that the more I “zip along the surface,” the harder it is to pay attention.

What I don’t agree with is Carr’s reaction. He writes in the book, and happily recounted in his talk, that before he wrote this book, he packed up his life in Boston and moved to the faraway mountains of Colorado. There’s no cell phone service there, he says, and only a “relatively poky DSL connection.” He left Twitter and Facebook, closed his blog, reduced his Skyping and IMing, and stopped using his RSS reader. Email refreshes were reduced to once an hour, and when that proved to be too distracting, he kept his email program closed for most of the day.

I admire the discipline, but the framing of it is misguided. “For months, my synapses howled for their Net fix,” he writes.

I found myself sneaking clicks on the “check for new mail” button. Occasionally, I’d go on a daylong Web binge. But in time the cravings subsided, and I found myself able to type at my keyboard for hours on end or to read through a dense academic paper without my mind wandering.

At the end of writing the book, Carr says he’s “already backsliding” into incessant email checking, blogging, Pandora-streaming, and all the rest.

The lumping together of all things digital is frustrating on its own, but what really frustrates is the idea that digital tools are little more than drugs, and highly addictive ones. They may well be harmful and habit-forming, under certain circumstances, but zero tolerance is definitely not the answer. Instead, I think we need to figure out ways to use the web (in all its forms) in smart, brain-friendly ways. Call it “digital literacy.” There’s nothing wrong with escaping to an analog mountaintop—we all need that—but it’s not a permanent solution.